Showing posts with label limited hangout. Show all posts
Showing posts with label limited hangout. Show all posts

Monday 6 March 2023

WHATSAPP DOC?












The WhatsApp messages are known in the trade as a limited hangout, a partial release of information to direct the narrative away from the most sensitive part of the story. Chomsky wrote extensively about Manufacturing Consent, so there's plenty of head starts for the sceptics and also, I think John Ehrlichman suggested 'a modified limited hangout' to Nixon, so it hasn't been scrubbed from the web.

Everything disclosed in the contrived WhatsApp messages was published two years ago in A State of Fear by Laura Dodsworth.



Just for the record, the World Health Organisation is the authority for the next pandemic we've been promised by Bill Gates. National politicians won't have any say in the lockdowns.

Well played deep state. A textbook tactic to the growing problem of the population's mass awakening.

Friday 4 August 2017

Why Does Seymour Hersh Behave Like A Blackmailed Paedophile?



I'm not suggesting Hersh is a child abuser for real. I am saying he peddles a limited hangout narrative that doesn't complete the circle. 

Any influential 9/11 denier is not to be trusted in this respect. 

That includes Noam Chomsky, Julian Assange, Ed Snowden and for sure Seymour Hersh who lost his credibility (and my respect) when his Bin Laden killing story was missing the vital info. 

It was Bin Laden's body double that was killed. Fortunately for us we would not have known it if that helicopter hadn't been downed. That wasn't supposed to happen, though the preposterous notion it had to be blown up confirms what is widely known in many circles.

Hersh is acting in this audio recording. Acting for his life?

Sunday 10 April 2016

The Mark Sargent Challenge





I've got some interesting analysis of Mark Sargent coming up in the future. He's so untrustworthy (bless his weasel cotton socks) but still good entertaining fun until he's outed.. and he will be. 

If the CIA (for example) is all over Hollywood, you can bet they're all over the video gaming industry too. Selling Middle Eastern terrorists, pimping Zionism, inflating the holocaust and pretending Israel weren't the architects of 9/11 and USS Liberty.

Enjoy it while it lasts.

Wednesday 29 January 2014

Edward Snowden's "Informal" Computer Training







I don't know about you but there's something about Edward Snowden that doesn't add up. I don't buy that he still isn't working for the national security parasite complex. He's not a computer administrator. He's a CIA spy who worked in Switzerland as such.

Update: He reminds us of his CIA career.

He's too smart to have rejected a college education without giving a good reason and hints in this interview (on Youtube now pulled) at an 'informal education' that somebody provided. 

Snowjob hasn't told me anything I don't know and he flat out tells a lie in this interview that he gave all his information to the American public. 

That's not true. 

Glen Greenwald took it, gave us 1% of nothing and is now scoring a book and movie deal with HollyWeird™ and a publishing venture with an NSA partner Paypal, while Edward Snowden claims like George Bush:



Mission Accomplished what a scrotum.

Nevertheless, the German Interviewer (video now pulled) here is so much more superior than the dribble the English language media-world spits out. Take a look yourself. Make your own mind up.

Here's a more interesting analysis of what's going on.

I recommend reading Naomi Wolf's piece on Ed Snowjob

Update: Wayne Madsen confirms that it's most likely Ed Snowjob is factional warfare between the CIA and NSA. This makes a lot of sense. Any friction between the two is good for us but that doesn't mean we're getting the whole story.

Thursday 27 June 2013

Is The NSA Trolling Ed Snowjob? (Is the CIA Trolling Julian?)




This morning I thought I'd write an explanation of why I think Julian Assange is both real and not what he says. I wanted to suggest that he might have started out on one trajectory and then changed course to another. I've tried to approach his mother to do interviews but that line of contact has now ceased and so while I believe Julian Assange's intentions are good I don't think he's in charge of the full game and any message carrier/whistleblower  who doesn't speak up about the 9/11 fairy tale can't be on the level because the evidence is so overwhelming.

I also think Edward Snowden may not be all he says he is. Both China and Russia have said no thanks to the most valuable information available and one they both offer large incentives for. If Ed Snowjob's information isn't good enough for Russia or China it isn't good enough for me. I've learned nothing I didn't know about before. I know more potential scenarios about hidden technology than most, and I also know more bullshit stories than most so take that caveat with my claim too. 

Edward Snowden is also on record as being the kind of sly fascist who would kill someone who leaks information. He said this only three years ago. 

That's not very cool is it?

The hypothesis I'm offering doesn't address the question of why would this pseudo-leaking or post modern limited hangout be made in the first place? One idea could be we're looking at internal tensions being played out between the CIA and the NSA both of whom Ed Snowjob worked for.

I think the answer is it's a PR trap to make Russia and China look bad. Syria is worsening and the only thing that is stopping the American's doing an Iraq/Afghanistan/Libya on Syria is the Western people's support for China and Russia. We don't trust our own governments any more and realise the old enemy is keeping the ship on an even keel

This is just an hypothesis and my thanks to Darren for articulating what I've been wanting to say about Julian and Edward for some considerable time with the Star Trek clip above. It demonstrates how complex the situation both Wikileaks and Snowden are in. I'm always open and positive towards all new information and ready to change my mind, but until Julian or Snowden talk about the fake 9/11 attacks it's no more real than the stuff we already know. Both may be naive but it's an intelligence test failure to be on the wrong side of history with respect to 9/11.

This is information warfare and truth is your only weapon. 

The above stands as mine.